State export data report
State-Origin Export Data by State: 2025 Manufacturing Market Report
Where does American export production actually move? This report ranks all 50 states using the latest complete annual state-origin merchandise export series, explains what the numbers can and cannot tell you, and turns the table into a usable market-planning tool for manufacturers.
Last updated: August 23, 2026
Texas merchandise exports, the largest state total
Ranked on one consistent state-origin basis
Share represented by the ten largest state totals in this table
Manufacturing exports by state, ranked
The table uses the Census Bureau's Origin of Movement merchandise export series for calendar year 2025. It is the cleanest consistent public measure for comparing the export activity attached to every state. Values are rounded, so totals may not match separate Census presentations exactly.
One distinction matters. Merchandise exports are not identical to manufacturing exports. The series also includes agricultural products, minerals, and other physical goods. We use it as a state manufacturing market proxy because manufactured products dominate many large state export baskets and because one nationwide state methodology makes comparison possible. Anyone quoting a row should call it a state-origin merchandise export value, not a pure factory-output measure.
| Rank | State | Exports | Share of table |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | $455.0B | 22.7% |
| 2 | California | $188.1B | 9.4% |
| 3 | Louisiana | $106.7B | 5.3% |
| 4 | New York | $101.8B | 5.1% |
| 5 | Illinois | $82.6B | 4.1% |
| 6 | Florida | $72.4B | 3.6% |
| 7 | Michigan | $70.2B | 3.5% |
| 8 | Washington | $67.8B | 3.4% |
| 9 | Ohio | $60.9B | 3.0% |
| 10 | New Jersey | $58.7B | 2.9% |
| 11 | Georgia | $55.8B | 2.8% |
| 12 | Pennsylvania | $52.6B | 2.6% |
| 13 | Indiana | $49.5B | 2.5% |
| 14 | North Carolina | $45.1B | 2.2% |
| 15 | Tennessee | $44.8B | 2.2% |
| 16 | South Carolina | $40.9B | 2.0% |
| 17 | Kentucky | $40.2B | 2.0% |
| 18 | Massachusetts | $39.4B | 2.0% |
| 19 | Minnesota | $28.5B | 1.4% |
| 20 | Arizona | $28.1B | 1.4% |
| 21 | Wisconsin | $27.8B | 1.4% |
| 22 | Virginia | $25.6B | 1.3% |
| 23 | Alabama | $25.3B | 1.3% |
| 24 | Oregon | $24.8B | 1.2% |
| 25 | Maryland | $18.7B | 0.9% |
| 26 | Missouri | $18.4B | 0.9% |
| 27 | Kansas | $14.9B | 0.7% |
| 28 | Iowa | $14.7B | 0.7% |
| 29 | Connecticut | $14.5B | 0.7% |
| 30 | Utah | $14.2B | 0.7% |
| 31 | Mississippi | $13.7B | 0.7% |
| 32 | Colorado | $12.8B | 0.6% |
| 33 | Nebraska | $11.2B | 0.6% |
| 34 | Arkansas | $10.4B | 0.5% |
| 35 | West Virginia | $9.6B | 0.5% |
| 36 | Nevada | $9.0B | 0.4% |
| 37 | Oklahoma | $8.8B | 0.4% |
| 38 | New Hampshire | $7.3B | 0.4% |
| 39 | Delaware | $6.7B | 0.3% |
| 40 | Idaho | $6.4B | 0.3% |
| 41 | Maine | $4.1B | 0.2% |
| 42 | New Mexico | $3.9B | 0.2% |
| 43 | Rhode Island | $3.1B | 0.2% |
| 44 | Vermont | $2.8B | 0.1% |
| 45 | North Dakota | $2.6B | 0.1% |
| 46 | Montana | $2.2B | 0.1% |
| 47 | Alaska | $2.0B | 0.1% |
| 48 | South Dakota | $1.8B | 0.1% |
| 49 | Hawaii | $0.7B | 0.0% |
| 50 | Wyoming | $0.6B | 0.0% |
What the state ranking says about U.S. production
Top 10 exporting states
The top 10 states in this table are Texas, California, Louisiana, New York, Illinois, Florida, Michigan, Washington, Ohio, and New Jersey. Calling each one a top exporting state describes merchandise value, not export dependence. A separate question, which states rely most on exports, requires comparing exports with state GDP and accounting for the difference between gross shipments and value added.
Year-to-year readers may also encounter 2024 rankings that differ from this 2025 table. Commodity prices, aircraft deliveries, pharmaceutical shipments, and oil and gas markets can move state values materially. Comparisons of exports and imports add another dimension, but imports are assigned under different trade concepts and shouldn't be subtracted from state exports as if the result were a state trade balance.
Texas operates at a different scale
Texas sits first at $455.0 billion, more than twice California's $188.1 billion. That lead reflects several export systems working together: energy and chemicals on the Gulf Coast, computer and electronic products, transportation equipment, machinery, and a dense land-trade network with Mexico. The number isn't a score for factory productivity. It shows the volume of goods beginning their recorded export movement in the state.
For an industrial seller, that scale creates a wide addressable market. Export-intensive plants buy inspection, packaging, freight, compliance, machine-tool, maintenance, and traceability services. Yet a broad Texas campaign can waste money. Houston-area chemical prospects, Dallas electronics firms, and border-region suppliers have different buying cycles and certifications.
California combines scale with product diversity
California ranks second with $188.1 billion. Its export base includes computers and electronics, transportation products, machinery, chemicals, and food products. Port infrastructure matters, but the Origin of Movement rule keeps the table from being a simple ranking of ports. Goods consolidated at a port can still be assigned to the state where their export journey began when documentation supports that origin.
That diversity makes California valuable for suppliers whose offer crosses sectors. Quality systems, precision components, electronics manufacturing services, and supply-chain software can each find distinct clusters. The useful unit of analysis is usually the metro and NAICS code, not the state alone.
The Gulf Coast is an export production corridor
Louisiana's $106.7 billion places it third. Texas and Louisiana together demonstrate why industrial location, feedstock access, river transport, pipelines, and ports shape export geography. Chemical and petroleum-related flows can push a state's value far above what its population would suggest.
High dollar value does not automatically mean a huge count of target accounts. A commodity-heavy export base can be concentrated among a limited number of large facilities. Vendors should compare export value with establishment counts from Census County Business Patterns before setting territory quotas.
The Great Lakes remains a factory belt
Illinois records $82.6 billion, Michigan $70.2 billion, Ohio $60.9 billion, Indiana $49.5 billion, and Wisconsin $27.8 billion. Transportation equipment, machinery, fabricated metals, chemicals, and food processing give the region an export base that is broad as well as deep.
This is where the ranking becomes useful for sales planning. A machine shop selling into automotive programs faces long qualification periods and demanding documentation. A packaging equipment builder selling into food plants has a different buying committee. State value tells you where to look. Sector and establishment data tell you whom to contact.
The Southeast has become a major production platform
Georgia reaches $55.8 billion, Tennessee $44.8 billion, South Carolina $40.9 billion, Kentucky $40.2 billion, and Alabama $25.3 billion. Automotive, aerospace, chemicals, machinery, paper, and electrical equipment all contribute across the region.
Greenfield investment can change supplier demand before it appears fully in annual export totals. Teams covering the Southeast should pair this historical table with plant announcements, state incentive records, hiring notices, and construction permits. Export data confirms the installed production base. Project intelligence spots the next wave.
How to interpret state export data correctly
Origin of Movement is not always origin of manufacture
The Census Bureau defines state origin around where the merchandise begins its journey to the port of export. Usually that is close to the producer, warehouse, or distribution point. Sometimes it is not. Goods can be stored, consolidated, or documented in a state other than the state where they were manufactured.
This is especially relevant for agricultural commodities, intermediaries, and distribution centers. The Census methodology is still useful because the same rule applies across the country. The limitation means you should avoid statements such as “every dollar was manufactured in this state.” A safer statement is “the state recorded this amount in state-origin merchandise exports.”
Dollar value measures price as well as physical volume
An export value can rise because factories shipped more units, because the product mix shifted toward higher-value goods, or because prices increased. It can fall while physical throughput holds steady. Analysts who need volume should look for quantity measures at the commodity level in Trade.gov and Census trade tools.
Inflation also complicates comparisons across distant years. Current-dollar export values should not be treated as real production growth without a suitable price adjustment. The Federal Reserve's manufacturing industrial production index answers a different question and can help separate output movement from trade-value movement.
Exports don't equal state manufacturing GDP
Exports are gross transaction values. State manufacturing GDP is value added, meaning the value created after subtracting intermediate inputs. The two numbers should never be divided without explaining the mismatch. Use BEA GDP by state when the question concerns industry contribution to a state economy. Use Census export data when the question concerns goods shipped to foreign markets.
Regional patterns manufacturers can use
Border access supports integrated production
Texas, California, Michigan, and Arizona each participate in cross-border supply chains with Mexico and Canada. China is also a major global trade counterpart for many U.S. sectors. A component may cross a border more than once during production. Customs value records a transaction, but it doesn't map every supplier relationship inside the finished product.
Manufacturers serving these corridors should treat customs classification as operating infrastructure. Accurate Harmonized System codes, country-of-origin records, valuation support, and screening procedures reduce delays. The Bureau of Industry and Security country guidance is a starting point for export-control obligations, although regulated exporters often need qualified legal advice.
Ports matter, but inland production still shows up
Washington, Louisiana, New York, New Jersey, Georgia, and South Carolina benefit from major gateways. Inland states such as Indiana, Kentucky, Iowa, and Kansas still post meaningful totals because machinery, transportation equipment, chemicals, food, and agricultural products enter foreign markets through rail, road, air, and river networks.
A supplier doesn't need to sit beside a seaport to serve exporters. Crating firms, testing labs, freight forwarders, automation integrators, and contract manufacturers often win on proximity to the plant. The plant's shipping lane is only one part of the buying decision.
Smaller states can have concentrated opportunities
A low state total is not a verdict on sales potential. Connecticut's $14.5 billion can contain high-value aerospace work. New Hampshire's $7.3 billion includes specialized electronics and machinery. Vermont's $2.8 billion can still support focused semiconductor and precision-manufacturing niches.
Account concentration changes the math. Ten qualified plants in a small state may be a better market than hundreds of mismatched companies in a large one. For niche industrial suppliers, fit beats gross export value.
How manufacturers can use this report
Build territories from multiple layers
Start with state export value to identify trade-intensive regions. Add manufacturing GDP from BEA, establishment counts from County Business Patterns, and occupation data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Then filter by the NAICS codes and plant characteristics your offer actually serves.
This sequence prevents a common mistake: confusing a large economy with a large reachable market. A state can export billions through industries that never buy your product. The final prospect list should reflect process, material, certification, equipment, headcount, and buying trigger.
Prioritize messages by export pressure
Exporters deal with delivery risk, documentation, foreign customer requirements, currency effects, and longer logistics chains. Those pressures create concrete messaging angles. A metrology company can speak to traceability and first-pass acceptance. A packaging supplier can address damage over long transit. An automation firm can quantify throughput and labor exposure.
Generic “improve efficiency” copy disappears. Tie the offer to the cost of a late container, a rejected lot, a missing certificate, or an unstable process. Industrial buyers respond when the problem sounds like their Tuesday morning.
Separate market size from account readiness
Annual public data changes slowly. Buying signals change quickly. After sizing the state and sector, look for expansions, new export certifications, international distributor agreements, capital-equipment purchases, and job postings. Those events are better indicators of timing than a single annual trend.
The EXIM customer map can help identify export-supported businesses and activity. The SBA export guide points smaller firms toward financing and assistance. State trade offices and the U.S. Commercial Service can add local context.
Sector signals behind the state totals
The top manufacturing sectors behind a state's total vary widely, which is why a top exporting rank can't identify the right account by itself. Product-level Census and International Trade Administration tools are the next step after this state screen.
Transportation equipment
Transportation equipment ties together several high-ranking states, but the underlying markets are not interchangeable. Michigan, Ohio, Indiana, Kentucky, Tennessee, Alabama, and South Carolina participate in automotive supply chains. Washington has a major aerospace base. Connecticut, Arizona, and Kansas also have specialized aerospace production. A sales territory labeled only “transportation” is too broad to be useful.
Automotive suppliers tend to care about launch schedules, production part approval, capacity, delivery performance, and cost-down expectations. Aerospace suppliers face long qualification cycles, configuration control, traceability, and demanding quality requirements. Both sectors export high-value products, yet the evidence required to win an order differs sharply.
Chemicals and refined products
The Gulf Coast's export position reflects capital-intensive plants, feedstock networks, and port access. Chemical production also matters in New Jersey, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, and other states. These facilities can create demand for corrosion-resistant equipment, pumps, valves, instrumentation, maintenance services, process safety support, and specialty fabrication.
Dollar value can be volatile because commodity prices move. A jump in export value does not prove that the number of operating plants or purchase orders rose at the same pace. Sales teams should combine trade data with turnaround schedules, permit filings, and facility-level capital projects.
Machinery and fabricated products
Machinery and fabricated metal supply chains spread across the Midwest, Great Lakes, Northeast, and parts of the South. This market is often less concentrated than refining or aircraft assembly. It includes original equipment manufacturers, job shops, component specialists, heat treaters, coaters, and industrial service firms.
That fragmentation rewards precise account selection. A shop's machine envelope, tolerances, materials, certifications, and end markets matter more than its generic “manufacturer” label. Export-state data can define the territory, but technical fit should define the list.
Electronics and advanced manufacturing
California, Texas, Arizona, Massachusetts, Oregon, New York, and several smaller states have meaningful electronics, semiconductor, instrument, or computer-product clusters. These products can carry high value in a small physical package, so freight tonnage and export dollars may tell different stories.
Suppliers targeting advanced manufacturing should watch cleanroom investment, fab construction, equipment installation, supplier localization, and engineering hiring. Those signals often appear before a new facility reaches steady export volume. State totals provide context after the investment starts producing.
A practical state market scoring model
A useful territory score should not simply sort this table from largest to smallest. Give each state a score for export value, relevant manufacturing establishments, target-sector concentration, recent capital projects, and your ability to serve the geography. Weight the categories according to your business.
For example, a regional maintenance contractor may give travel distance and installed plant count more weight than exports. A specialized aerospace processor may emphasize sector concentration and certifications. A software company can cover a broader geography, but integration requirements and company size may matter more.
Keep the model simple enough to explain. A five-factor score that your sales team trusts is more useful than a complicated model nobody updates. Review annual structural data once or twice a year and refresh buying signals monthly. That keeps long-term market size separate from short-term account timing.
Export risks that affect industrial buying
Foreign demand exposes manufacturers to more than ordinary domestic sales risk. Tariff changes, export controls, sanctions, port disruption, currency movement, documentation errors, and foreign standards can alter landed cost or delay a shipment. Those pressures reach upstream suppliers even when the supplier never files an export declaration.
A component maker may need to preserve material certificates because its customer's finished system goes abroad. A contract manufacturer may be asked to screen controlled technical data. A packaging vendor may need to meet wood-treatment or labeling rules. The exporter's obligation can become a supplier requirement through purchase orders and quality manuals.
Industrial vendors should be specific about what they can document. Claims about compliance need evidence, ownership, and a defined scope. When regulations are involved, consult the relevant government guidance and qualified professionals. The Bureau of Industry and Security publishes export-control resources, while customs classification and trade remedies may involve other agencies.
Methodology and definitions
This report uses 2025 annual merchandise export values from the U.S. Census Bureau Foreign Trade state data program. We ranked the 50 states by state-origin value and rounded each result to the nearest $0.1 billion. The displayed share is each rounded state value divided by the sum of rounded values in the table. Because the table excludes the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and other U.S. territories, its summed total is not a replacement for the official national total.
“Manufacturing exports by state” is the search and planning frame. “State-origin merchandise exports” is the precise name for the metric shown. The report does not estimate manufactured-goods-only exports by state, real export growth, jobs supported by exports, or value added. Those require different datasets and assumptions.
Revisions can occur. For published financial, policy, or investment work, retrieve the current Census table and retain the download date. Rounded figures here are intended for comparison and market planning, not customs filing.
Frequently asked questions
Which state exports the most goods?
Texas ranks first in this report with $455.0 billion in 2025 state-origin merchandise exports. Energy, chemicals, machinery, electronics, transportation equipment, and trade with Mexico all contribute to its scale.
Are these manufactured-goods exports only?
No. The table covers merchandise and includes manufactured goods, agricultural products, minerals, and other physical products. It is a consistent proxy for comparing state export markets, not a manufactured-only series.
Does the export state always equal the manufacturing state?
No. Census assigns state origin using the place where goods begin their export journey. Distribution and consolidation can separate that point from the factory location.
Can I compare exports with manufacturing GDP?
You can analyze them side by side, but they measure different things. Exports are gross shipment values. BEA manufacturing GDP measures value added.
Sources
- U.S. Census Bureau, State Trade Data, Origin of Movement, annual state export values and methodology.
- International Trade Administration, Trade Data and Analysis, state and product trade research tools.
- Bureau of Economic Analysis, GDP by State, state manufacturing value-added context.
- U.S. Census Bureau, County Business Patterns, establishment and employment context.
- Bureau of Labor Statistics, Occupational Employment and Wage Statistics, workforce context.
- Federal Reserve, Manufacturing Industrial Production, production-volume context.
- Bureau of Industry and Security, Country Guidance, export-control guidance.
- Export-Import Bank of the United States, Customer Map, export-supported company context.
- U.S. Small Business Administration, Export Products, exporter assistance.
Cite this report
Manufacturing Lead Generation. “State-Origin Export Data by State: 2025 Manufacturing Market Report.” Updated August 23, 2026. https://manufacturingleadgeneration.com/state-origin-export-data/
For an individual state value, cite the U.S. Census Bureau source directly as the underlying dataset.