Last updated: April 28, 2026
Manufacturing Payroll by State: Where the Factory Paychecks Are
Manufacturing payroll is one of the cleanest ways to see where industrial activity is actually concentrated. Headcount matters, but payroll tells you where companies are supporting large workforces, paying for skill, and sustaining real plant-level output. In the latest Census Bureau state business data, US manufacturers paid more than $851.3B in annual payroll across 12.19M workers.
This resource organizes all 50 states in one place using Census Bureau Statistics of U.S. Businesses data for manufacturing (NAICS 31-33), then layers in BEA and BLS context so you can compare total payroll, average annual pay per worker, establishment counts, payroll intensity, and the dominant manufacturing industry in each state. Every key figure is sourced, and the state table is citation-friendly for journalists, economic developers, and industrial marketers.
$851.3B
US manufacturing annual payroll
$69,847
Average annual pay per worker
285,394
Manufacturing establishments
42.7
Average employees per plant
What's in this report
National manufacturing payroll snapshot
The state totals roll up to $851.3B in payroll, $7071.9B in receipts, and roughly 12.2 million workers in the Census Bureau's latest full state business count for manufacturing. That lines up closely with other major federal sources. The Bureau of Labor Statistics reported about 12.6 million manufacturing employees in early 2026, while the National Association of Manufacturers puts average annual compensation, wages plus benefits, at more than $100,000 per worker. Payroll is lower than compensation because payroll measures cash pay, not the full employer benefits package.
Three patterns jump out right away. First, the biggest payroll states are not always the most manufacturing-dependent states. California and Texas dominate in total dollars because they are enormous economies. Second, several Midwestern and Southern states have far higher manufacturing concentration, meaning a larger share of their workforce still depends on the factory floor. Third, average pay per worker tracks with industry mix. Electronics, aerospace, chemicals, and advanced transportation manufacturing push pay much higher than food processing or lower-complexity assembly.
Key takeaways
California alone accounts for more than 12.1% of US manufacturing payroll, and the top three states, California, Texas, and Ohio, account for nearly 25% of all factory payroll dollars in the country.
Wisconsin and Indiana are not top-two in raw payroll dollars, but they are the two most manufacturing-concentrated state workforces in this dataset, each with roughly 18% of workers tied to manufacturing.
The national average pay per worker is about $69,847, but California, Massachusetts, and Connecticut all sit well above that mark because of higher-value product mixes and more expensive labor markets.
Top states by total manufacturing payroll
If you're trying to understand where the heaviest industrial payroll bases sit, the top tier is straightforward. California leads the country at $103.4B, followed by Texas at $62.9B. Ohio, Michigan, Illinois, Pennsylvania, and Indiana round out the classic industrial belt. Those seven states combine large workforces with long-established supplier ecosystems, which is why they continue to anchor so much payroll even as new factory investment spreads south and west.
What's more interesting is how the top 10 breaks into two groups. California, Texas, New York, and North Carolina have scale because they are large, diverse economies. Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Wisconsin, and Pennsylvania have scale because manufacturing still sits near the center of their economic identity. That's useful if you're benchmarking market size. A state can be attractive because it offers a huge addressable industrial base, or because manufacturers are unusually concentrated and easier to reach.
| Rank | State | Annual payroll | Workers | Largest payroll industry |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | $103.4B | 1,160,856 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 2 | Texas | $62.9B | 847,587 | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 3 | Ohio | $44.9B | 686,189 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 4 | Michigan | $39.2B | 595,273 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 5 | Illinois | $37.8B | 534,710 | Food Manufacturing |
| 6 | Pennsylvania | $37.4B | 560,912 | Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing |
| 7 | Indiana | $34.1B | 527,426 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 8 | Wisconsin | $31.1B | 477,411 | Food Manufacturing |
| 9 | New York | $28.8B | 411,668 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 10 | North Carolina | $28.2B | 467,211 | Chemical Manufacturing |
Source: US Census Bureau, Statistics of U.S. Businesses, 2022 state manufacturing dataset.
Highest-paying states per manufacturing worker
Total payroll rewards size. Average pay per worker tells a different story. California leads here too at $89,048, but Massachusetts, Connecticut, Louisiana, Washington, and Wyoming are right behind for very different reasons. In Massachusetts and Connecticut, high average pay reflects advanced electronics, aerospace, medical, and precision manufacturing. In Louisiana and Wyoming, a big chemical and energy-processing footprint lifts payroll per worker without creating huge employment counts.
This is why average pay should never be read in isolation. A state with high average pay can be a great signal if you're selling capital equipment, industrial software, or specialized services, because it often means complex operations and larger budgets. But it can also point to a smaller labor pool or a more expensive operating environment. On the other side, lower average pay states like Mississippi, Arkansas, and South Dakota still carry very serious manufacturing concentration. They just sit in different segments of the market.
| State | Avg. annual pay |
|---|---|
| California | $89,048 |
| Massachusetts | $87,771 |
| Connecticut | $85,751 |
| Louisiana | $84,224 |
| Washington | $79,351 |
Why pay per worker matters
A higher average paycheck usually means one of three things, a more technical product mix, a tighter labor market, or a state where big plants are concentrated in capital-intensive sectors like aerospace, semiconductors, chemicals, and advanced transportation.
For lead generation, those are often the accounts with longer sales cycles, larger budgets, and more formal buying teams. If your service only works for bigger, more sophisticated manufacturers, this column is one of the fastest filters you can use.
Source: US Census Bureau SUSB state dataset. Average pay is calculated as annual payroll divided by employment.
States where manufacturing still dominates the workforce
When you sort by manufacturing's share of each state's workforce, the map changes. Wisconsin ranks first at 18.4%, just ahead of Indiana at 18.3%. Iowa, Mississippi, Kentucky, Michigan, and Alabama also stand out. These are places where manufacturing is not just present, it's structurally important. That matters for labor, politics, site selection, and demand generation. Industrial buyers in these states are easier to find because the local economy is more visibly organized around plants, suppliers, logistics, and technical services.
There is also a scale lesson here. Florida has a larger total manufacturing payroll than Iowa, Alabama, South Carolina, or Kentucky, but manufacturing is a much smaller slice of Florida's workforce. That means Florida offers scale without the same industrial concentration. If you need a broad TAM, that's fine. If you need dense clusters of OEMs, contract manufacturers, and machining or fabrication shops, the Midwest and Southeast still look much stronger.
| State | Manufacturing share of workforce | Employees per plant | Top industry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wisconsin | 18.4% | 56.1 | Food Manufacturing |
| Indiana | 18.3% | 66.2 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Iowa | 16% | 64.8 | Food Manufacturing |
| Mississippi | 15.6% | 73.2 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Kentucky | 15.3% | 69.6 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Michigan | 15.1% | 48.8 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Alabama | 15.1% | 64.6 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Arkansas | 14.8% | 63.8 | Food Manufacturing |
| Ohio | 13.8% | 51.2 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Kansas | 13.7% | 62 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
Source: US Census Bureau SUSB state dataset. Share is calculated from manufacturing employment divided by total state employment in the same release.
The most payroll-intensive manufacturing states
Payroll as a share of receipts is a rough proxy for how labor-heavy a state's manufacturing base is. Massachusetts, New Hampshire, and Connecticut are at the top, all near 20%. That usually points to higher-value, more skill-dependent production where labor remains a bigger part of the output equation. Louisiana sits on the opposite end at just 3.7%, a reminder that high receipts in chemicals and refining can dwarf payroll even when wages are strong.
This metric is useful when you're segmenting the market. Labor-intensive manufacturing states are more likely to care about staffing, retention, training, recruiting, and process efficiency. Lower payroll-intensity states often lean harder into capital spending, compliance, uptime, and feedstock economics. Neither is better, but they are different operating environments, and your offer should match that reality.
| State | Payroll / receipts | Avg. pay | Top industry |
|---|---|---|---|
| Massachusetts | 20.2% | $87,771 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| New Hampshire | 20.2% | $73,705 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| Connecticut | 19.9% | $85,751 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Rhode Island | 18.5% | $66,832 | Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing |
| Vermont | 18.5% | $64,048 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| Arizona | 17.8% | $77,564 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| Maine | 17.3% | $62,860 | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| Oregon | 16.6% | $75,458 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| New York | 16.1% | $70,061 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| Colorado | 15.9% | $74,083 | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
Source: US Census Bureau SUSB state dataset. Payroll intensity is calculated as annual payroll divided by receipts.
Full 50-state manufacturing payroll table
The table below is the fast reference version. If you're writing a story, quoting a pitch deck, comparing sales territories, or building a target-account list, this is usually the section you want bookmarked. It includes the total payroll number, headcount, average pay per worker, establishment count, plant size, payroll intensity, and top payroll-driving industry for every state.
| Rank | State | Payroll | Workers | Avg. pay | Plants | Employees / plant | Mfg share | Top industry |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | California | $103.4B | 1,160,856 | $89,048 | 35,936 | 32.3 | 7.2% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 2 | Texas | $62.9B | 847,587 | $74,155 | 20,781 | 40.8 | 7.4% | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 3 | Ohio | $44.9B | 686,189 | $65,461 | 13,390 | 51.2 | 13.8% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 4 | Michigan | $39.2B | 595,273 | $65,795 | 12,196 | 48.8 | 15.1% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 5 | Illinois | $37.8B | 534,710 | $70,711 | 12,530 | 42.7 | 9.7% | Food Manufacturing |
| 6 | Pennsylvania | $37.4B | 560,912 | $66,707 | 13,245 | 42.3 | 10% | Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing |
| 7 | Indiana | $34.1B | 527,426 | $64,657 | 7,964 | 66.2 | 18.3% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 8 | Wisconsin | $31.1B | 477,411 | $65,080 | 8,505 | 56.1 | 18.4% | Food Manufacturing |
| 9 | New York | $28.8B | 411,668 | $70,061 | 13,931 | 29.6 | 4.9% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 10 | North Carolina | $28.2B | 467,211 | $60,438 | 8,704 | 53.7 | 11.4% | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 11 | Georgia | $24.2B | 403,419 | $59,912 | 7,860 | 51.3 | 9.5% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 12 | Florida | $22.9B | 353,423 | $64,875 | 13,942 | 25.3 | 3.7% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 13 | Minnesota | $22.8B | 320,033 | $71,159 | 6,800 | 47.1 | 11.7% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 14 | Tennessee | $22.0B | 347,969 | $63,187 | 5,800 | 60 | 12.2% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 15 | Massachusetts | $20.4B | 232,734 | $87,771 | 6,008 | 38.7 | 6.9% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 16 | Washington | $20.4B | 256,728 | $79,351 | 6,745 | 38.1 | 8.6% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 17 | Missouri | $17.8B | 277,514 | $64,105 | 5,490 | 50.5 | 10.8% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 18 | Alabama | $16.8B | 267,658 | $62,706 | 4,145 | 64.6 | 15.1% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 19 | South Carolina | $16.3B | 253,776 | $64,410 | 3,990 | 63.6 | 12.6% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 20 | New Jersey | $16.3B | 220,198 | $73,907 | 7,075 | 31.1 | 5.8% | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 21 | Virginia | $15.9B | 246,208 | $64,647 | 4,963 | 49.6 | 7% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 22 | Kentucky | $15.8B | 254,697 | $62,218 | 3,659 | 69.6 | 15.3% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 23 | Iowa | $14.6B | 221,514 | $65,934 | 3,418 | 64.8 | 16% | Food Manufacturing |
| 24 | Arizona | $13.3B | 171,133 | $77,564 | 4,456 | 38.4 | 6.1% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 25 | Oregon | $13.2B | 175,272 | $75,458 | 5,309 | 33 | 10.5% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 26 | Connecticut | $13.0B | 151,851 | $85,751 | 3,772 | 40.3 | 10.1% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 27 | Kansas | $11.5B | 167,278 | $68,914 | 2,699 | 62 | 13.7% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 28 | Colorado | $10.0B | 135,443 | $74,083 | 5,105 | 26.5 | 5.5% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 29 | Louisiana | $9.8B | 116,680 | $84,224 | 3,050 | 38.3 | 7.1% | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 30 | Utah | $9.8B | 145,855 | $67,256 | 3,655 | 39.9 | 9.6% | Miscellaneous Manufacturing |
| 31 | Arkansas | $9.1B | 161,239 | $56,379 | 2,529 | 63.8 | 14.8% | Food Manufacturing |
| 32 | Mississippi | $8.3B | 147,818 | $56,095 | 2,019 | 73.2 | 15.6% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 33 | Maryland | $8.1B | 104,739 | $77,026 | 2,859 | 36.6 | 4.3% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 34 | Oklahoma | $7.9B | 125,239 | $63,071 | 3,245 | 38.6 | 9% | Machinery Manufacturing |
| 35 | Nebraska | $6.3B | 102,150 | $61,441 | 1,769 | 57.7 | 11.5% | Food Manufacturing |
| 36 | New Hampshire | $5.0B | 67,557 | $73,705 | 1,755 | 38.5 | 11% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 37 | Idaho | $4.5B | 67,843 | $66,358 | 2,102 | 32.3 | 9.8% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 38 | Nevada | $4.5B | 61,344 | $72,544 | 2,027 | 30.3 | 4.8% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 39 | Maine | $3.5B | 55,849 | $62,860 | 1,690 | 33 | 10.5% | Transportation Equipment Manufacturing |
| 40 | West Virginia | $3.0B | 47,318 | $64,032 | 1,075 | 44 | 8.8% | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 41 | Rhode Island | $2.7B | 40,506 | $66,832 | 1,206 | 33.6 | 9.2% | Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing |
| 42 | South Dakota | $2.7B | 46,600 | $57,635 | 1,039 | 44.9 | 12.5% | Food Manufacturing |
| 43 | Delaware | $2.1B | 29,767 | $71,025 | 608 | 49 | 7% | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 44 | Vermont | $1.9B | 30,125 | $64,048 | 1,020 | 29.5 | 11.8% | Computer and Electronic Product Manufacturing |
| 45 | North Dakota | $1.8B | 27,802 | $64,742 | 691 | 40.2 | 8.1% | Machinery Manufacturing |
| 46 | New Mexico | $1.7B | 29,639 | $58,186 | 1,311 | 22.6 | 4.6% | Food Manufacturing |
| 47 | Montana | $1.4B | 21,843 | $62,383 | 1,415 | 15.4 | 5.5% | Petroleum and Coal Products Manufacturing |
| 48 | Wyoming | $0.8B | 10,113 | $79,322 | 604 | 16.7 | 4.9% | Chemical Manufacturing |
| 49 | Alaska | $0.8B | 10,824 | $73,497 | 564 | 19.2 | 4.2% | Food Manufacturing |
| 50 | Hawaii | $0.5B | 10,375 | $49,016 | 743 | 14 | 2% | Food Manufacturing |
Primary source: US Census Bureau, Statistics of U.S. Businesses, state by industry data. Manufacturing is NAICS 31-33. Payroll values are annual payroll in current dollars.
How to use this data if you sell to manufacturers
If you're doing industrial lead generation, this page helps in three ways. First, total payroll is a strong proxy for market size. Second, average pay per worker is a quick signal for sophistication and budget. Third, manufacturing share of workforce tells you where industrial density is highest, which usually makes prospecting easier. Put those three together and you can build a much smarter territory plan than just sorting by population or GDP.
For example, California and Texas are hard to ignore because they combine huge payroll bases with large plant counts. Indiana, Wisconsin, and Kentucky are ideal if you want denser manufacturing ecosystems where referrals and supplier networks travel quickly. Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Arizona are more useful when your offer fits advanced manufacturing, electronics, aerospace, or precision work. There isn't one best state. There is only the best state for the kind of manufacturer you actually help.
If you want help turning data like this into a pipeline strategy, from target account selection to content, paid search, and conversion paths, our team can help you narrow in on the right industrial buyers instead of chasing the whole map.
Turn Your Manufacturing Website Into a Lead Engine
Get the free 5-day email course: the 5 fixes that turn your site from a brochure into an RFQ machine.
Get the Free 5-Day Course →Cite this data
Suggested citation:
Manufacturing Lead Generation. "Manufacturing Payroll by State (2026): Annual Payroll, Pay per Worker and Plant Data." ManufacturingLeadGeneration.com, April 28, 2026. https://manufacturingleadgeneration.com/manufacturing-payroll-by-state/ Sources
- US Census Bureau. Statistics of U.S. Businesses, 2022 state by 6-digit NAICS dataset. Primary source for annual payroll, employment, receipts, and establishments. www2.census.gov/programs-surveys/susb/tables/2022/us_state_6digitnaics_2022.txt
- US Census Bureau. 2022 SUSB annual data tables by establishment industry. Background and table release documentation. census.gov/data/tables/2022/econ/susb/2022-susb-annual.html
- US Census Bureau. 2022 SUSB annual datasets by establishment industry. Dataset landing page and methodology notes. census.gov/data/datasets/2022/econ/susb/2022-susb.html
- US Bureau of Economic Analysis. GDP by state release for preliminary 2024 data, useful for economic context around state manufacturing output. bea.gov/news/2025/gross-domestic-product-state-and-personal-income-state-4th-quarter-2024-and-preliminary
- US Bureau of Labor Statistics. Manufacturing sector overview for current national employment context. bls.gov/iag/tgs/iag31-33.htm
- National Association of Manufacturers. Facts About Manufacturing, expanded edition. Used for compensation context and sector benchmarks. nam.org/mfgdata/facts-about-manufacturing-expanded/