Last Updated: May 8, 2026
75+ Manufacturing Capacity Utilization Statistics for 2025-2026
Capacity utilization is one of the cleaner ways to read the factory floor. It tells you how much of installed production capacity is actually being used, which matters when you're quoting new work, planning shifts, buying equipment, or trying to explain why a supplier's lead time moved from three weeks to eight.
This resource pulls 82 data points from the Federal Reserve's G.17 Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization release, plus matching FRED series. The short version: US manufacturing was running at 75.2% of capacity in March 2026, below the long-run average and uneven across sectors. Electrical equipment and petroleum products looked tight. Motor vehicles, furniture, primary metals, and communications equipment looked softer.
What's in This Report
National Manufacturing Capacity Utilization
The Federal Reserve's G.17 release is the benchmark source for US industrial production, manufacturing output, factory capacity, and capacity utilization. When utilization is high, plants are closer to full load. That can mean overtime, longer quoted lead times, tighter scheduling windows, and more pressure to invest in equipment. When utilization is low, the signal is different: spare capacity exists, but that doesn't always mean the right machine, the right skilled operator, or the right certification is available.
The broad 2026 reading is not a boom signal. Manufacturing utilization was below its long-run average, and output remained slightly under its December 2019 level. That matters for owners and marketing teams. A plant can be busy in one cell and still underutilized across the building. Sector data gives you the better read.
1. The Federal Reserve reported total industrial capacity utilization at 75.7% in March 2026, 3.7 percentage points below its 1972 to 2025 average. Source
2. Manufacturing output slipped 0.1% in March 2026, but still grew at a 3.0% annual rate during the first quarter. Source
3. Total industrial production was 101.8% of its 2017 average in March 2026. Source
4. Manufacturing production, measured on a NAICS basis, registered 98.0 on the Federal Reserve index in March 2026. Source
5. Manufacturing capacity registered 130.3 on the Federal Reserve capacity index in March 2026. Source
6. Manufacturing utilization was 75.2% in March 2026, down 0.4 percentage points from March 2025. Source
7. Manufacturing utilization was 2.0 percentage points below its December 2019 level of 77.2%. Source
8. Durable manufacturing utilization was 74.1% in March 2026. Source
9. Nondurable manufacturing utilization was 76.4% in March 2026. Source
10. Durable manufacturing output was 99.9 on the production index in March 2026, 1.7 points above March 2025. Source
11. Nondurable manufacturing output was 96.0 in March 2026, 0.6 points below March 2025. Source
12. Total manufacturing capacity grew 1.6 index points from March 2025 to March 2026. Source
Manufacturing Capacity Utilization by Sector
Sector-level utilization is where the data becomes useful for quoting and sales planning. A general "manufacturing is slow" headline doesn't help a job shop decide whether to chase aerospace brackets, electrical cabinets, automotive stampings, or pump components. The spread is wide. Petroleum and coal products ran near 90% utilization in March 2026, while motor vehicles and parts sat below 65%.
| # | Sector | March 2026 Utilization | YoY Change | Vs. Dec. 2019 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 13 | Machinery | 80.7% | +2.3 pts | +2.3 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 14 | Nonmetallic mineral products | 81.2% | -0.2 pts | +8.3 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 15 | Electrical equipment, appliance, and component | 87.7% | +1.5 pts | +10.7 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 16 | Petroleum and coal products | 89.4% | +0.1 pts | +6.6 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 17 | Food, beverage, and tobacco | 77.9% | -1.6 pts | +0.3 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 18 | Paper | 78.0% | -1.5 pts | -11.0 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 19 | Fabricated metal products | 76.9% | +2.3 pts | -4.3 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 20 | Miscellaneous manufacturing | 76.8% | -1.2 pts | -3.3 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 21 | Plastics and rubber products | 74.6% | 0.0 pts | -9.0 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 22 | Computer and electronic products | 74.1% | -1.2 pts | +0.8 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 23 | Chemicals | 73.4% | -2.5 pts | -3.1 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 24 | Aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment | 72.1% | +3.0 pts | +0.4 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 25 | Wood products | 69.9% | -2.6 pts | -11.1 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 26 | Printing and related support activities | 69.9% | -2.2 pts | -4.3 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 27 | Textiles and products | 69.4% | -1.6 pts | +0.7 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 28 | Apparel and leather goods | 67.6% | -1.8 pts | -3.8 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 29 | Primary metals | 67.1% | +1.0 pts | -4.8 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 30 | Furniture and related products | 66.8% | -0.9 pts | -20.6 pts | Fed G.17 |
| 31 | Motor vehicles and parts | 64.9% | -1.8 pts | -7.6 pts | Fed G.17 |
Two takeaways jump out. First, the tightest sectors are not always the ones getting the most media attention. Electrical equipment and petroleum products were far above the manufacturing average. Second, transportation equipment split hard. Aerospace utilization improved, while motor vehicles and parts remained soft. If you're building a sales list, don't treat transportation as one market.
High-Tech and Semiconductor Capacity Data
High-tech manufacturing is the odd case in this dataset. Output and capacity expanded quickly, but utilization did not look tight in March 2026. That combination usually means new capacity came online faster than near-term production absorbed it. For suppliers, it means the headline growth is real, but timing matters. A fab expansion can create years of tooling, automation, HVAC, power, and precision component work before utilization ever looks full.
| # | Segment | Utilization | Production Signal | Capacity Signal | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 32 | Computers, communications equipment, and semiconductors | 69.0% | 183.0 | 265.1 | Fed G.17 |
| 33 | Computer and peripheral equipment | 81.6% | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | Fed G.17 |
| 34 | Communications equipment | 60.3% | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | Fed G.17 |
| 35 | Semiconductor and other electronic components | 70.2% | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | Fed G.17 |
| 36 | Manufacturing excluding high-tech | 75.5% | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | noted separately in G.17 utilization detail | Fed G.17 |
Production Index and Capacity Growth Benchmarks
Capacity utilization is a ratio. You need both sides of the ratio to read it correctly. If output rises but capacity rises faster, utilization can fall. If output is flat but a weaker plant base exits, utilization can rise. That is why the Federal Reserve publishes industrial production, capacity, and utilization together.
Industrial Production Indexes
| # | Series | March 2026 Index | YoY | Vs. Dec. 2019 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 37 | Total industry | 101.8 | +0.7 pts | +0.1 pts | Fed IP |
| 38 | Manufacturing | 98.0 | +0.6 pts | -1.0 pts | Fed IP |
| 39 | Durable manufacturing | 99.9 | +1.7 pts | +0.4 pts | Fed IP |
| 40 | Nondurable manufacturing | 96.0 | -0.6 pts | -2.4 pts | Fed IP |
| 41 | Machinery | 93.3 | +2.7 pts | -5.4 pts | Fed IP |
| 42 | Motor vehicles and parts | 102.6 | -3.6 pts | +1.5 pts | Fed IP |
| 43 | Aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment | 95.7 | +5.6 pts | +3.8 pts | Fed IP |
| 44 | Chemicals | 102.6 | -0.7 pts | +6.5 pts | Fed IP |
| 45 | Petroleum and coal products | 91.3 | +2.0 pts | -3.6 pts | Fed IP |
| 46 | Computers, communications equipment, and semiconductors | 183.0 | +11.7 pts | +65.8 pts | Fed IP |
Industrial Capacity Indexes
| # | Series | March 2026 Index | YoY | Vs. Dec. 2019 | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 47 | Total industry capacity | 134.5 | +1.8 pts | +2.5 pts | Fed capacity |
| 48 | Manufacturing capacity | 130.3 | +1.6 pts | +2.1 pts | Fed capacity |
| 49 | Durable manufacturing capacity | 134.8 | +1.4 pts | +4.0 pts | Fed capacity |
| 50 | Nondurable manufacturing capacity | 125.7 | +1.8 pts | +0.5 pts | Fed capacity |
| 51 | Machinery capacity | 115.6 | +0.1 pts | -10.3 pts | Fed capacity |
| 52 | Motor vehicles and parts capacity | 158.0 | -1.1 pts | +18.7 pts | Fed capacity |
| 53 | Aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment capacity | 132.7 | +2.3 pts | +4.6 pts | Fed capacity |
| 54 | Chemical manufacturing capacity | 139.9 | +3.7 pts | +14.2 pts | Fed capacity |
| 55 | Petroleum and coal products capacity | 102.2 | +2.1 pts | -12.6 pts | Fed capacity |
| 56 | High-tech capacity | 265.1 | +38.0 pts | +105.1 pts | Fed capacity |
Historical Highs, Lows, and Cycle Signals
The useful question isn't only "what is utilization today?" It is "how unusual is this reading?" Manufacturing's long-run average sits around the high 70s. A move above the mid 80s usually feels tight on the floor. A move into the 60s usually means the order book has a problem, except in sectors that are structurally changing or absorbing new capacity.
57. Manufacturing utilization averaged 78.1% from 1972 through March 2026. Source
58. Manufacturing utilization hit a data-series high of 88.5% in November 1973. Source
59. Manufacturing utilization hit a data-series low of 62.5% in April 2020. Source
60. Durable manufacturing utilization fell to 55.4% in April 2020, the lowest point in the durable series. Source
61. Nondurable manufacturing utilization bottomed at 68.9% in April 2009. Source
62. Motor vehicles and parts utilization collapsed to 14.6% in April 2020. Source
63. Motor vehicles and parts utilization reached 113.5% in August 1950, the highest point in the series. Source
64. Wood product utilization reached a low of 47.8% in May 2009. Source
65. Primary metals utilization reached 101.9% in December 1973. Source
66. Furniture and related products utilization was 66.8% in March 2026, 20.6 points below December 2019. Source
67. Computers, communications equipment, and semiconductors utilization reached 69.0% in March 2026, even though output was 65.8 index points above December 2019. Source
68. Electric and gas utilities utilization was 70.3% in March 2026, below the sector's 84.0% long-run average. Source
Stage-of-Process Capacity Utilization
Stage-of-process data helps separate raw material and upstream pressure from final assembly conditions. Crude processing ran hotter than finished processing in March 2026. That gap matters for manufacturers buying castings, forgings, resin, sheet, plate, or other inputs. A plant can have open assembly labor and still wait on upstream material.
| # | Series | March 2026 | YoY or Code | Vs. Dec. 2019 or Note | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 69 | Crude processing utilization | 83.4% | +1.0 pts | +7.7 pts | Fed data |
| 70 | Primary and semifinished processing utilization | 75.5% | -0.4 pts | -2.6 pts | Fed data |
| 71 | Finished processing utilization | 72.9% | -0.9 pts | -3.4 pts | Fed data |
| 72 | Crude processing capacity index | noted in G.17 stage-of-process capacity tables | capacity series B5610C | monthly source file | Fed data |
| 73 | Primary and semifinished processing capacity index | noted in G.17 stage-of-process capacity tables | capacity series B562A3C | monthly source file | Fed data |
| 74 | Finished processing capacity index | noted in G.17 stage-of-process capacity tables | capacity series B5640C | monthly source file | Fed data |
How Manufacturers Should Use This Data
Capacity utilization is not a sales forecast by itself. It is a pressure gauge. Use it with your RFQ volume, backlog, win rate, quote-to-close time, and margin data. If your target sector is running hot and your quote volume is weak, you may have a visibility problem. If your target sector is running cold and your pipeline is full of low-margin work, you may be quoting into a buyer's market.
75. A shop quoting into electrical equipment should know the sector was running at 87.7% utilization, meaning available capacity may be tighter than the broad manufacturing average. Source
76. A metal fabricator selling into fabricated metal products can benchmark against 76.9% sector utilization, 2.3 points above March 2025. Source
77. A machine shop serving machinery OEMs can point to 80.7% machinery utilization and 2.7 points of year-over-year production growth. Source
78. An automotive supplier should price risk carefully because motor vehicles and parts utilization was only 64.9%, while output fell 3.6 points year over year. Source
79. Aerospace suppliers saw a better demand signal, with aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment utilization up 3.0 points year over year and output up 5.6 points. Source
80. Chemical manufacturers had 73.4% utilization in March 2026, but their capacity index was 14.2 points above December 2019. Source
81. High-tech manufacturing capacity more than doubled versus December 2019, rising 105.1 index points by March 2026. Source
82. Manufacturing excluding high-tech ran at 75.5% utilization in March 2026, close to the all-manufacturing rate of 75.2%. Source
For marketing teams, this resource is also a positioning tool. A supplier selling into aerospace can talk about capacity strain and recovering output. A supplier selling into automotive should be more careful, because buyers may be pushing price. A shop selling maintenance, automation, or throughput projects can use utilization data to frame the cost of constrained capacity, especially in sectors above 80%.
Methodology Notes for Capacity Utilization Data
The Federal Reserve Board, part of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, publishes the G.17 industrial production and capacity utilization release as seasonally adjusted economic data. FRED, maintained by the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, republishes key United States capacity utilization and US capacity utilization series for researchers who want chartable data. In this report, capacity utilization means the utilization rate or operating rate for a given industry compared with estimated sustainable capacity. The capacity utilization rate is shown as a percentage point measure, so a move from 75% to 76% is a one percentage point increase, not a 1% increase.
The Federal Reserve Board's capacity indexes attempt to capture the greatest level of output that a plant or industrial sector can sustain under a realistic work schedule, not a one-day maximum. That is why capacity indexes, industrial production, real output, manufacturing output, and capacity utilization for manufacturing need to be read together. The North American Industry Classification System, or NAICS, is used for manufacturing industries including durable goods, nondurable manufacturing, motor vehicles and parts, petroleum and coal products, plastics and rubber products, and aerospace and miscellaneous transportation equipment.
The same release also covers utility, electric and gas utilities, mining, the operating rate for mining, the operating rate for utilities, utilization rates for mining, rates for mining and utilities, total industrial production, the index for business equipment, industrial and other equipment, output of consumer goods, output of primary metals, and growth in the output of major market groups. We keep those terms here because they explain how manufacturing activity fits inside the broader U.S. industrial production and capacity utilization system. Source
FAQ: Manufacturing Capacity Utilization
What is manufacturing capacity utilization?
Manufacturing capacity utilization is the percentage of estimated factory capacity currently being used. The Federal Reserve publishes it monthly in the G.17 Industrial Production and Capacity Utilization release. Source
Is 75% manufacturing capacity utilization good or bad?
It is below normal by historical standards. Manufacturing utilization was 75.2% in March 2026, while the long-run average since 1972 was about 78.1%. Source
Which manufacturing sectors had the highest utilization in March 2026?
Petroleum and coal products were at 89.4%, electrical equipment was at 87.7%, nonmetallic minerals were at 81.2%, and machinery was at 80.7%. Source
Want More Qualified Manufacturing Leads?
If your best-fit sectors are running hot, your sales team should be visible before buyers start sending RFQs. Get the free course on building a manufacturing lead system that attracts serious industrial buyers.
Get the Free Qualified Leads Course →Cite This Resource
Suggested citation:
Manufacturing Lead Generation. "75+ Manufacturing Capacity Utilization Statistics (2025-2026)." Last updated May 8, 2026. https://manufacturingleadgeneration.com/manufacturing-capacity-utilization-statistics/
Sources
Every statistic above links to its source in the table or stat card. These are the primary source pages used for this resource.
Federal Reserve G.17 Current Release
Monthly industrial production and capacity utilization release, April 16, 2026.
Federal Reserve Capacity Utilization Data File
Seasonally adjusted utilization series by manufacturing sector.
Federal Reserve Industrial Capacity Data File
Seasonally adjusted capacity indexes by manufacturing sector.
Federal Reserve Industrial Production Data File
Seasonally adjusted industrial production indexes by market and industry group.
Federal Reserve G.17 Data Download Documentation
Documentation for G.17 tables, data files, revisions, and series definitions.
Capacity Utilization: Manufacturing, NAICS, sourced from the Board of Governors.
Industrial Production: Manufacturing, NAICS, sourced from the Board of Governors.